Total Pageviews

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

THEY DO PLAY FOOTBALL IN PALAU AFTER ALL, MATT

Out of the world's myriad of independent countries, only a few are not part of FIFA, and out of those, only three or four at most do not have an international football team of some description. Even fewer have no organised football at all. According to Matt, an acquaintance of your correspondent, the tiny Pacific nation of Palau is one such place. He called in to the homestead a few weeks ago whilst on the way to somewhere else, and we fell into conversation, during which he mentioned that he had just come back from a ten-day holiday in Palau, which he enjoyed immensely, and had spent no small amount of time diving among the tiny Pacific nation's coral-reefs.

When asked about the football scene in Palau, he merely shrugged his shoulders and said that the Palauans didn't play football, or, at least, he had heard nothing about the game being played locally. That came as no big surprise, to be fair, as Matt is no fan of what that icon of British broadcasting, Stuart Hall, calls "the beautiful game." However, the game is indeed played in Palau, but not entirely as per the FIFA rule-book. Before we go on to that, however, time for a quick geography lesson (not least for yours truly).

The Republic of Palau (Belau in the Palauan language), situated some 500 miles due east of the southern Philippine island of Mindanao and 2000 miles south of Japan, was the final Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands to achieve independence when it became a sovereign state in 1994. It, together with the Northern Mariana Islands, the Marshall Islands and what are now the Federated States of Micronesia, was a United Nations trusteeship under American supervision from 1947 until independence.

Palau, an archipelago spread over thousands of square miles of the Pacific Ocean, consists of more than 250 islands covering a total land area of less than 180 square miles with a population of just under 21000 people, more than half of whom live on Koror Island.

Koror is also home to the Palau Football Association, which was formed in May 2002, and the PFA's first ten years in existence have not been without their fair share of problems; a local league was initiated in 2004, but it was discontinued in 2007. Charles Reklai Mitchell, a Palauan-American who grew up in the Californian city of San Diego and played college football for California State Northridge between 2000 and 2003, moved to Palau in 2007 and began working with the PFA early in 2008. He is now the association's president, and has overseen the return of an organised league in the archipelago, which is still only based on Koror and the neighbouring island of Malakal.

When Mitchell arrived in the islands, he found the PFA, and football in Palau in general, in a state of neglect. Only now, four years on, has he and a small band of fellow volunteers, been able to sufficiently resurrect organised football in the tiny republic to the extent that Koror's league has been revived and an inter-island youth tournament created.

He said: "It almost feels like we are starting from scratch..Football in Palau was around [when he arrived in 2008], but [there was] no-one to organize it properly." The league stopped after the 2006-07 due what Mitchell called "a lack of personnel."

"In Palau," Mitchell continued, "it is very difficult to find volunteers to organize a league. There is a handful of us wearing 3 hats, so to say. That league [2006-07] was mainly [staffed] with foreigners, which is not a bad thing, but my mentality was to develop the youth for the future in order to have higher quality local players. The league went on for years and we haven't gotten anywhere [near] international play. It's better to have strong roots or the whole thing will collapse. Without consistent development, gaps begin to form and weaken the influence of football within the community."

This season, there are five teams competing in the PFA Spring League, which only lasts a matter of weeks. It began on 11/3/12, and this season's participants are Team Bangladesh - who won the last national league championship, played in 2007, and who are also the only team from that era to take part in this year's competition; they could justifiably be called the current league champions - Belau Kanu Club, Biib Strykers, Kramers FC, and, last but not least, Taj.

Judging by their names, some of the teams who participated in previous incarnations (and the current version) of the PFA League seem to have comprised at least partly of migrant workers: Mount Everest Nepal, Taj and Team Bangladesh to name but three; a throwback to Mitchell's earlier comments. The teams competing this season have all been sponsored by local businesses; Taj, for example, is the name of a local restaurant, while Kramers FC is sponsored by a café based on Malakal.

What sets adult football in Palau apart from that played in most of the rest of the world is that teams are 9-a-side, and comprise of both men and women. The country, or Koror, at any rate, has just 57 registered players: 53 men and 4 women. Each team plays each other once, with matches lasting 60 minutes instead of the regulation 90, and the top four teams then move on to the classic semi-final and final format.

Team Bangladesh finished top of the 5-team "regular" season this time round, winning all of their games in the process. They were drawn against Biib Strykers in the semi-finals, with second-placed Taj taking on Kramers FC in the other semi. (Belau Kanu Club finished bottom of the group and pointless.) Team Bangladesh disposed of the Strykers in some style, winning by 6 goals to 1, thanks in part to a Malakai Bitu hat-trick, is second of the campaign.

In the other semi, which proved to be even more of a high-scoring affair, Taj defeated Kramers FC 8:4 with Futa and Toni Ililau scoring hat-tricks for Taj; Futa registered his treble in the first 10 minutes, and that after Kramers FC had opened the scoring through Tabet Kano in the first minute. The result of the final between Taj and Team Bangladesh, played on 22/4/12 was a 2:1 win for the "current" league champions, though the match details were not to hand at the time of writing.

That takes care of the present, but what of the future of the game in Palau? Mitchell reckons that the future of the game in the islands definitely belongs to today's youth. There is a national sports tournament, the Belau Games, which takes place every two years, and football was included in the set-up for the first time in 2011. The tiny republic is divided into 16 states, with 10 of them, including Melekeok, which houses the nation's capital, Ngerulmud, situated on the largest island in the republic, Babeldaob. Four states (Airai, Koror, Ngardmau and the eventual winners, Ngeremlengui) sent representative football teams, though there were problems even here, according to the PFA president.

"The Belau Games in 2011 for all sports were open to adults. [Having said that], there are not enough Palauan adults who play football," he said. "I put an age limit of 14 and under to cater to the youth build-up for years to come. In 2013, the soccer event will have no age limits since most of the kids in the program now will be around 16 years of age. In June of this year, the youth games will be conducted, which [will feature teams of age] 18 & under. We will hold two competitions with the age groups being 14-18 and 10-13 years of age."

The Palau Football Association also organise after-school "camps" for local children of primary-school age at the PCC Track & Field (also referred to as the Palau National Track & Field), the country's national stadium, and the PFA estimated that more than 100 schoolchildren have already taken part so far this year.

Meanwhile, the PFA are also looking to expand senior football further, at least on Koror. The 5 clubs taking part in the association's Spring League are, as mentioned earlier, all sponsored by private businesses, and the PFA are looking for locals to come together and organise clubs which are not financed by private companies. Biib Strykers are also planning to develop the nation's first proper youth team later this year. According to Mitchell, the format of the PFA's Autumn League - or, failing that, future editions of PFA league championships - may well change as the number of clubs increases.

"We will be conducting another adult league in the fall which will be longer. Depending on the number of registered teams, every team will play each other twice before moving on. There is a possibility in the play-offs we might adopt the UEFA ruling on "legs". That will something to really consider. We hope to begin the fall (autumn) season in October."

Mitchell also mentioned that the PFA are looking further ahead, and further afield. "In 2014 the Micronesian Games are held in Pohnpei [in the Federated States of Micronesia] and I hope they offer football as an event. It will give a chance to have all islanders watch and play football."

Not only that, but the PFA joining a continental confederation should not be ruled out, and, according to the PFA president, this may happen sooner rather than later, though he remains realistic.

"In order to apply for FIFA, I believe we need to join an international federation first. We have been exchanging emails with the Guam Football Association. GFA president Richard Lai recently said he will mention our interest in joining the EAFF[East Asian Football Federation], AFC at a meeting in Shanghai.

"There are pros and cons with everything, but the EAFF is a better choice. The chance to conduct friendlies with various nations would be logistically easier than trying to send a team to Papua New Guinea, Samoa, etc. The competition is strong in the AFC and [participation in major tournaments is unrealistic at this time] because we are just getting our footing and will be thrown into the deep end. At this point we will go with whatever federation that is willing to accept our application, but leaning towards EAFF."

Membership of the EAFF might well be a better option for the PFA; travelling costs would certainly add up to a lot less than were they to join the OFC (Oceania Football Confederation). For instance, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands are, in comparison to Samoa, a hop, skip and jump away from Palau. The Philippines, too, are a lot closer than most of the OFC member nations.

And, when your budget is as limited as that of the Palau Football Association, every penny counts; according to the PFA website, the association's annual income (garnered mostly thanks to the kindness of others) averages out at around just US$800 per annum, while annual expenditure is put at some US$500. Of course, with such a tiny population, an equally small budget, not to mention an apathy for the game among large sections of the country's adult population - American team sports such as baseball and basketball are still the most popular in the archipelago - expansion is difficult, Mitchell added.

"I would say our biggest needs are coaching and refereeing qualification courses along with the strengthening of our adminstration. It's very hard to do [any of this] without a budget. It would be nice to have a certified instructor on island to conduct courses for all interested volunteers. Eventually the PFA will need to provide coaches and referees that hold the credentials that will allow them to perform their duties at an international level."

He concluded by saying: "I think football in Palau is another great team sport to create productive people for the community. I don't expect Palau to win a World Cup, but there is potential for kids to possibly get scholarships for school. There is a lot of natural talent, its just a matter of constantly working with them. The biggest problem here is our population. It is really low and kids here do not concentrate on one sport. It is hard to keep a kid interested in a sport if there is no incentive such as travelling to other islands for youth tourneys."

Palau, then, although hampered as it is by having a small population, many of whom are apathetic towards football, and the distances between it and even its closest neighbours, has a football association staffed by volunteers who, although inexperienced, are determined to see it grow and improve. The PFA may well be taking baby steps at the moment and finding their feet - in Charles Mitchell's own words: "This is the first time I have organized a league and with that I have learned what to improve on" - but every tiny step forward is a sign of progress.

Membership of FIFA, or even the EAFF, may well be a long way off, but it is heartening to see Palau's local governing football body look at things in a sensible manner. In fact, the world's biggest clubs and federations could learn a few lessons from what the Palau Football Association are doing, and how they are doing it with about as much money as what would keep Cristiano Ronaldo in football boots for a couple of months. It augurs well for the future of football in the small republic..and going to a game at the PCC Track & Field might give Matt something else to do with his Sunday afternoon the next time he's in the area.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AUTHOR'S NOTE: Many thanks to Charles Mitchell for his kindness, patience, co-operation and permission to glean information from the Palau Football Association website:

http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page.cgi?c=2-1609-0-0-0&sID=14442

Other information was taken from the RSSSF website:

http://www.rsssf.com/results-aso.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HELP BILLY WALK APPEAL: The Help Billy Appeal, ongoing since last year, aims to raise enough money to enable a young 3-year-old boy, Billy Douglas, who comes from a village just outside Belfast and who suffers from spastic diaplegia, to undergo an urgent and potentially life-changing operation. Should you wish to know more, Billy's plight has been highlighted in a recent entry here on Pat's Football Blog:

http://patmcguinness.blogspot.com/2012/04/theres-appeal-in-box-help-billy-walk.html

Or, of course, for those who might want to bypass the article and go straight to goal, the appeal's website address is:

www.helpbillywalkappeal.co.uk


If you can donate, please do so. If not, kindly post either link on your Facebook page if you have one and share, or tweet. Many thanks.






Tuesday, April 17, 2012

EVERYBODY'S DOING THE POZNAN..OR ARE THEY?

Maybe this article will highlight a case of someone floating through daily football life in a blissfully unaware fashion, but I was sitting down to a very recent edition of Football Focus (broadcast on the BBC every Saturday afternoon during the regular football-season) when Stoke City's Peter Crouch began talking about his father "doing the Poznań up in the gods." Er, doing the what?? This was new to me, but it wasn't long before I was able to put two and two together, and it was certainly different to what I call "doing the Crouch."

(Remember the Crouchmeister's little robot-dance after scoring for England against Jamaica all those years ago? A few of us exiled Reds fans, living in the same small town in the middle of continental Europe, regularly performed the "Crouch" whilst watching Liverpool games on TV in the local bar, singing "Do the Peter Crouch" - to the tune of the "Monster Mash" - much to the obvious bemusement of the natives. Stoke City fans have my permission to imitate, with the proviso that an acknowlegement be given.)

"Doing the Poznań," of course, refers to the action of whole sections of supporters turning their backs to the game, locking their arms together and bouncing up and down in lines along the stand, usually whilst indulging in a sing-song or chant. The term, if not the bounce, was born after Manchester City fans, attending the away game against Polish side Lech Poznań in the UEFA Cup (sorry, Europa League) in 2010, witnessed the occurrence and were so impressed with what they saw that they immediately began imitating it, and named the action in honour of their hosts. Obviously, City fans (not to mention the rest of the British public) had never seen the like of it before, or, at least, those under the age of 20, and not in football stadia, at any rate.

However, the "Poznań" has been done within borders of the United Kingdom before, when the action had no known name, and you can thank a bunch of Croatians for that. Croatia, of course, qualified for Euro 96, and brought several hundred supporters with them, who bounced their way up and down England, attired in Croatia's famous checked shirts all, many of them wearing bobby hats and all of them confusing and bewildering the natives.

It remains odd, however, that their jumping and up and down whilst facing away from the pitch wasn't picked up by the British followers of football at the time; there was the odd comment in the press and the odd photograph in the occasional footie magazine or two, but that was about all.

The "Poznań" is actually reputed to have began life on the terraces in either Greece or Turkey - which is entirely plausible as it imitates the classically stereotypical wedding/party dance performed in both countries - sometime in the 1960s and is, understandably, more properly known as "la Grècque" ("the Greek") throughout Europe (according to information contained in a discussion on the Video Celts forum).

It can be performed whilst either facing or turning one's back on the pitch, and a perfect example of this was to be seen at the beginning of the 2000 UEFA Cup final in Copenhagen between Arsenal and Galatasaray, when the Turkish club's supporters kept it up for minutes on end early on in the game. They did the "Grècque" whist facing the pitch; this is still most common in Greece and Turkey. In some other countries, most notably Germany and Holland, pogoing is very popular.

In 2006, Derry City fans took up the Grècque after watching Paris Saint-Germain supporters indulging in a bit of a knees-up during their UEFA Cup match at the Parc des Princes..and have to continued to do so to this day. Celtic fans will claim that they were busy with their terrace version of the "Huddle" for years, but it may well have been that the Candystripes' support was the first in the British Isles to take up "la Grècque." 

Apart from when your team are losing to Manchester City, watching the City support "doing the Poznań" is fun to watch, certainly more so than the "Mexican Wave", and probably a lot more fun to participate in as well. Mind you, when the Celtic fans "do the Huddle", it takes on a life of its own, a stadium-shaking form of almost awe-inspiring proportions.

The only problem some football philosophers seem to have with the little dance routine is that it seems to have, in several cases, become "merely" a goal celebration instead of something more spontaneous. Others seem to think that their club's set of fans invented the "Poznań", and resent others imitating it.

Then again, we've all seen that with football chants, songs and what not; football fans, by nature, imitate and adapt where neccessary. Witness the ongoing debate between Liverpool and Celtic supporters as to who first sang the old Rogers & Hammerstein classic (superbly covered in the early 1960s, of course, by Gerry & The Pacemakers) "You'll Never Walk Alone." Let's face it, who cares?

Personally, I find the "Poznań" a lot less irritating than having to hear supporters, sitting in half-empty grounds, singing along to Dario G (the man who fired the final, fatal shot into the cadavre of pop music by ruining a perfectly good Italian terrace song from the early 1990s and turning it into the theme tune for the 1998 World Cup) - or singing the tune the whole way through the game - The Fratellis or Pigbag before the ball bounces after hitting the back of the opposition's net. It's also infinitely more preferable to the "[Fill in your own club name here]..till I die" routine, especially when performed to the accompaniment of the England "band" at international matches.

Regardless of whether the media and every fan connected to a club in the Premier League will eventually get bored of talking about, or doing, the Poznań, Grècque, Huddle, Olimpia, Croatia or whatever you want to call it, at least it temporarily gave the flock something else to do than harping on about goal-line technology..

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AUTHOR'S LINK: Some more articles for your reading and viewing pleasure now..

Never mind the Poznań, here's la Grècque, performed in Paris, Derry City-style:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxWZQZcX44k&feature=related
Slovenia fans at Euro 2000:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/4749053/Slovenia-left-to-lament-sour-ending.html
Olimpia Ljubljana fans against Liverpool, UEFA Cup 2002:
http://www.soccerphile.com/soccerphile/news/euro-red-diary/euro-red-diary-1.html
Video Celts - Lech Poznan; invented in 1961 and called the "Grècque"?:
http://videocelts.com/2011/05/blogs/fans/liverpool-return-to-celtic-again-for-ideas
Saint-Etienne fans showing how it should be done:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzTd4umWc3A&feature=related
In the interests of fair play, first up, the Celtic support shaking Paradise to its roots:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbjccPaO4K0
And, just to balance things out, Man City fans doing the same at Wembley:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5RtnXcQ_lw&feature=related
To finish off, the "original" and still the best; Lech's supporters just couldn't not be included:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8vHkNn9f_A&feature=youtube_gdata
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HELP BILLY WALK APPEAL: And now that you're all Poznańed-out, time for a serious message. The Help Billy Appeal, ongoing since last year, aims to raise enough money to enable a young 3-year-old boy, Billy Douglas, who comes from a village just outside Belfast and who suffers from spastic diaplegia, to undergo an urgent and potentially life-changing operation. Should you wish to know more, Billy's plight has been highlighted in a recent entry here on Pat's Football Blog:

http://patmcguinness.blogspot.com/2012/04/theres-appeal-in-box-help-billy-walk.html

Or, of course, for those who might want to bypass the article and go straight to goal, the appeal's website address is:

www.helpbillywalkappeal.co.uk


If you can donate, please do so. If not, kindly post either link on your Facebook page if you have one and share. Many thanks.




Tuesday, April 10, 2012

THERE'S AN APPEAL IN THE BOX - HELP BILLY WALK ALONE (AND UNAIDED)

The football world was shocked and dismayed at the sudden collapse of Bolton Wanderers’ Fabrice Muamba during the FA Cup quarter-final tie against Spurs on St. Patrick’s Day, which resulted in him reportedly suffering from a cardiac arrest. Happily, the 23-year-old DRC Congolese-born player is showing encouraging signs of progress, although it remains to be seen if he will ever recover enough to play professional football again. It is hoped that, at least, he shall recover enough from his ordeal to lead a normal life.

The by now (at times tackily) well-documented story of Muamba’s ordeal, and that of Aston Villa’s Bulgarian ex-international Stillian Petrov, who was more recently diagnosed with acute leukaemia (and good luck to him in dealing with it), really should put football, and the nonsense which frequently surrounds it, in its proper place in the pecking-order of life, as the subject of this particular blog most certainly does.

Pat’s Football Blog, meanwhile, has covered many subjects related to the world of football, from the world's remotest football club (Tristan da Cunha FC) to the goalposts used in the deciding game of the 1950 World Cup, through to all the fun of the FIFA fair. Time for a first for this blog, though; time to cover something which is as far removed from the parallel and often unreal world of football as it can get - the story of a young boy's struggle to walk, one which is rapidly turning into a race against time.



BRAVE..Billy Douglas




Three-year-old Billy Douglas lives in the quiet Northern Irish town of Ballygowan, and is a bright, happy youngster, who suffers from Spastic Diplegia, a form of cerebral palsy which can affect the arms, but more commonly affects the legs. In Billy's case, Spastic Diplegia left him unable to move his legs or feet.

Billy was first diagnosed with the condition at a year old after his mother Savien brought him to Belfast's Musgrave Park Hospital when it became apparent that he failed to begin crawling or walking. Savien and husband William were shattered to learn that Billy had been diagnosed with brain-damage.

The couple have two healthy children, teenage daughter Catherine and seven-year-old Robert, but the Douglas family had been shadowed by tragedy even before Billy's birth. In 2003, Savien and William's first son, also called William, was born.

Sadly, baby William died just after birth from a condition called Potter's Syndrome (also known as Renal Agenesis), which happens when the baby, whilst in the womb, has no kidneys, and this means that without said organs, the unborn child cannot produce amniotic fluid in the womb. This, in turn, restricts lung development in the baby. Many babies with Potter's Syndrome are still-born; those which are born alive almost invariably die within a couple of days of being delivered. William was born without a bladder or kidneys.

Then, in 2006, the family were dealt another cruel blow when another son, Charlie, was still-born. The deaths of both children, and Billy's current health problems, would be shattering blows for any family, but the Douglas family are determined to ensure that their youngest child will have a bright future.

Savien and William were told by doctors at the Ulster Hospital in Dundonald (East Belfast) that they were unable to operate on Billy, and were instead advised to consider a process called Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy, which involves cutting the nerves at the base of the spine. 

The operation is not available in Northern Ireland, and was scheduled to have been carried out in the United States city of St. Louis, but, the couple have recently received news that there is a surgeon in the south-western English city of Bristol who may be willing to carry out the operation. However, the operation, whether carried out in St. Louis or Bristol, together with corrective physiotherapy, does not come cheap. The operation and physiotherapy combined will, Savien and William estimate, cost in the region of £50000.

For the Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy operation to be have any chance of success, any child with Spastic Diplegia would have to undergo it somewhere between their second and fourth birthday. Billy will be four years old in September. 

The clock, then, is ticking for the brave youngster, and for his fundraising campaign, the Help Billy Walk Appeal, which, in less than a year, due to some superb fundraising events, ranging from concerts to Savien and company abseiling down the front of Belfast’s Europa Hotel, has raised an admirable £40000, to the immense credit of one and all involved. To get Billy walking is the campaign's first target; any excess monies raised will go towards the creation of a holiday-home in Northern Ireland for kids with cerebral palsy.

One of the simplest descriptions of cerebral palsy can be found on the Scope website (Scope is a UK-based organisation, and its website address is: www.scope.co.uk):

"Cerebral palsy is a condition that affects muscle control and movement. It is usually caused by an injury to the brain before, during or after birth.

"Children with cerebral palsy have difficulties in controlling muscles and movements as they grow and develop."


The Help Billy Walk Appeal is an entirely voluntary operation; Savien and a host of friends are running the campaign. There is no paid CEO taking charge, nor will you see any Children In Need-style adverts on telly for this one; cerebral palsy (still less Spastic Diplegia) is definitely not a "sexy" disease - it affects roughly 1 in 500 children, according to some NHS estimates dating back to 1997 - nor is it something in which the present British government (or many other governments across Europe) would be terribly interested, if current trends are anything to go by.

After all, they've left the disabled, the elderly and the vulnerable out to dry and to more or less fend for themselves over the past few years. So, in place of a government which doesn't really have the interests of the less-fortunate at heart, the onus is on the general public to do what it can. 

In this case, it means helping one young boy towards having a viable future, and could end up helping many more like him. No chance of Fearne Cotton or Gary Lineker dropping by to lend a hand, much less the Department of Health releasing funds to pay for Billy's operation and further assistance, unfortunately, but the Help Billy Appeal is certainly in full-swing regardless of the lack of any major backing. However, it must be stressed that time is running out for Billy to have his operation.

Dear reader, wherever you are in the world, your help would be gratefully received, be it financial or merely passing on the link at the end of this article to, for instance, your local football team - or, indeed, their supporters' club - and requesting their assistance.

If you are someone who writes a blog, why not post the link to this blog - or the link to the appeal - on your blog and earn some brownie points? (Please drop this scribe a line, if at all possible, if you are planning on doing so, or, better still, raising money for the appeal, preferably by leaving a message on Pat's Football Blog's Facebook page.) Good publicity for your blog, good publicity for the Help Billy Walk Appeal. Everybody wins.


If you are able to donate, any amount of money (pounds sterling, preferably), be it £1 or £1000, would be a help and, at the same time, greatly appreciated. (Details of how to pay can be found on the appeal’s website, via the bottom of this article.) It would be, financially, more valuable than the Jimmy Glass goal which kept Carlisle United in the Football League. It would mean more than the Crouchmeister's winner for Spurs against Man City the season before last which put Harry’s boys into the Champions' League. It would mean, in all sorts of ways, an immeasurable amount to a family, and a young boy, who are all due some good fortune.

Please follow the link to the Help Billy Walk Appeal website - the appeal also has its own Facebook page -  which includes not only news on fundraising activities and information on Billy and his condition, but how to donate (via trusty old Paypal) to what is a very deserving cause:

http://www.helpbillywalkappeal.co.uk/index.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AUTHOR'S NOTE: Any factual errors contained within the above blog, while unintentional, are the responsibility of the author and the author alone.

An update on how the appeal is progressing will be posted in May. 
 









Sunday, March 25, 2012

2012 AFC CHALLENGE CUP - RESULTS

North Korea have won the 2012 AFC Challenge Cup, which is designed to be a competition for the lowest-ranked national teams in the Asian Football Confederation (AFC), and which was held in Nepal. The Chollima defeated Turkmenistan 2:1 in the 2012 final of the fourth edition of the tournament after falling behind to an early Berdimyrat Şamyradow goal (scored after just two minutes), which was wiped out by an Jong Il-Gwan equaliser ten minutes before half-time.

The North Koreans, who were defending the trophy they had won for the first time in 2010, won the match courtesy of a Jang Song-Hyok penalty in the 87th minute, and thus qualified for the next edition of the Asian Cup, which will be held in Australia in January 2015. For Turkmenistan, it was a case of déjà vu; they also ended the 2010 edition (hosted by Sri Lanka) as runners-up to the North Koreans, losing 5:4 on penalties after extra-time finished one-all.

The AFC Challenge Cup is contested by the Asian confederation's so-called "emerging" national teams (as the AFC describes them), which comprises of the AFC's 17 lowest-ranked teams; however, several countries from that the AFC calls "developing nations" (second-level national teams) and even one or two from the AFC's "mature (developed) nations" (i.e. those in the top echelons of Asian football), such as North Korea, regularly take part in the competition. They are, according to the "AFC Challenge Cup Regulations & Guidelines", "invited to participate at the discretion of the AFC."

The 2012 competition, involved 20 teams in all, including 4 which were eliminated following a series of two-leg qualifying play-offs, which took place in February and March last year, and 16 teams which took part in four qualifying groups, which were completed by April last year. (Out of those AFC member countries eligible to compete, Brunei Darussalam, Guam and East Timor (Timor-Leste) did not enter the competition.)

Back to the finals of the competition now, and in the third-place play-off, the Philippines defeated Palestine by 4 goals to 3 in a ding-dong 90 minutes of football, thanks to a brace from the final tournament's top-scorer, Phil Younghusband, and the Guirado brothers, Juan and Ángel, also scored a goal apiece. Phil Younghusband scored 6 goals during the final stages of the competition; his older brother James is also part of the Azkals' set-up.

Palestine's goals, meanwhile, were scored by Abdelhamid Abuhabib, who also scored twice, and Fahed Attal. As a result of the appearance of both teams in the third-place match, the Philippines and Palestine achieved their best-ever international successes. The Philippines were ranked among the weakest of all the nations taking part in the AFC Challenge Cup, and only just squeaked through their preliminary round tie against Mongolia, winning 3:2 on aggregate; this makes their achievements all the more praiseworthy.

The fine performances of the Azkals and Palestine were in marked contrast with those of Nepal, the hosts, and India. Sadly, although India stormed through the qualifiers, neither they nor Nepal scored a goal during the finals, and both teams finished pointless and bottom of their groups. India's lack of achievement at international level, even with the I-league system entering its fifth season and apparently in fine fettle, remains a worry.

The results for every match played in the competition, including the qualifying campaign, which was completed last year, are below. The matches which took place during the finaltournament were played at two stadiums in Kathmandu, the national stadium - the Dasarath Rangasala Stadium (abbreviated below to DRS) - and the Halchowk Stadium (HS), also known as the APF Ground.

PRELIMINARY ROUND (PRE-QUALIFYING PLAY-OFFS)

FIRST LEG

9/2/11   Philippines 2:0 Mongolia
9/2/11   Cambodia 3:1 Macau
10/2/11 Taiwan (Chinese Taipei) 5:2 Laos
23/3/11 Bhutan 0:3 Afghanistan

SECOND LEG

16/2/11 Laos 1:1 Taiwan (Chinese Taipei)
TAIWAN 6:3 ON AGG.
16/2/11 Macau 3:2 Cambodia AET
CAMBODIA 5:4 ON AGG.
15/3/11 Mongolia 2:1 Philippines
PHILIPPINES 3:2 ON AGG.
25/3/11 Afghanistan 2:0 Bhutan
AFGHANISTAN 5:0 ON AGG.


QUALIFYING ROUND

GROUP A

21/3/11 Burma (Myanmar) 1:1 Philippines
21/3/11 Palestine 2:0 Bangladesh
23/3/11 Philippines 0:0 Palestine
23/3/11 Bangladesh 2:0 Burma (Myanmar)
25/3/11 Burma (Myanmar) 1:3 Palestine 
25/3/11 Bangladesh 0:3 Philippines

P/W/D/L/GF/GA/PTS/GD
PALESTINE  3/2/1/0/5/1/7/+4
PHILIPPINES 3/1/2/1/4/1/5/+3
Bangladesh 3/1/0/2/2/5/3/-3
Burma (Myanmar) 3/0/1/2/2/6/1/-4


GROUP B

21/3/11 Turkmenistan 3:0 Pakistan
21/3/11 India 3:0 Taiwan (Chinese Taipei)
23/3/11 Pakistan 1:3 India
23/3/11 Taiwan (Chinese Taipei) 0:2 Turkmenistan
25/3/11 Turkmenistan 1:1 India
25/3/11 Taiwan (Chinese Taipei) 0:2 Pakistan

P/W/D/L/GF/GA/PTS/GD
INDIA  3/2/1/0/7/2/7/+5
TURKMENISTAN 3/2/1/0/6/1/7/+5
Pakistan 3/1/0/2/3/6/3/-3
Taiwan (Chinese Taipei) 3/0/0/3/0/7/1/-7


GROUP C

21/3/11 Tajikistan 1:0 Kyrgyzstan
21/3/11 Maldives 4:0 Cambodia
23/3/11 Kyrgyzstan 1:2 Maldives
23/3/11 Cambodia 0:3 Tajikistan
25/3/11 Tajikistan 0:0 Maldives
25/3/11 Cambodia 3:4 Kyrgyzstan

P/W/D/L/GF/GA/PTS/GD
MALDIVES  3/2/1/0/6/1/7/+5
TURKMENISTAN 3/2/1/0/4/0/7/+4
Pakistan 3/1/0/2/5/6/3/-1
Cambodia 3/0/0/3/3/11/0/-8


GROUP D


7/4/11  North Korea 4:0 Sri Lanka
7/4/11  Afghanistan 0:1 Nepal
9/4/11  Nepal 0:1 North Korea
9/4/11  Sri Lanka 0:1 Afghanistan
11/4/11 Nepal 0:0 Sri Lanka
11/4/11 North Korea 2:0 Afghanistan

P/W/D/L/GF/GA/PTS/GD
NORTH KOREA  3/3/0/0/7/0/9/+7
NEPAL 3/1/1/1/1/1/4/+0
Afghanistan 3/1/0/2/1/3/3/-2
Sri Lanka 3/0/1/2/0/5/1/-5



FINALS TOURNAMENT

GROUP A

8/3/12   Turkmenistan 3:1 Maldives (HS)
8/3/12   Nepal 0:2 Palestine (DRS)
10/3/12 Palestine 0:0 Turkmenistan (HS)
10/3/12 Maldives 1:0 Nepal (DRS)
12/3/12 Nepal 0:3 Turkmenistan (DRS)
12/3/12 Maldives 0:2 Palestine (HS)

P/W/D/L/GF/GA/PTS/GDTURKMENISTAN  3/2/1/0/6/1/7/+5
PALESTINE 3/2/1/0/4/0/7/+4
Maldives 3/1/0/2/2/5/3/-3
Nepal 3/0/0/3/0/6/1/-6



GROUP B

9/3/12   North Korea 2:0 Philippines (HS)
9/3/12   India 0:2 Tajikistan (DRS)
11/3/12 Tajikistan 0:2 North Korea (HS)
11/3/12 Philippines 2:0 India (DRS)
13/3/12 North Korea 4:0 India (DRS)
13/3/12 Tajikistan 1:2 Philippines (HS)

P/W/D/L/GF/GA/PTS/GDNORTH KOREA  3/3/0/0/8/0/9/+8
PHILIPPINES 3/2/1/0/4/3/6/+1
Tajikistan 3/1/0/2/3/4/3/-1
India 3/0/0/3/0/8/1/-8



SEMI-FINALS

16/3/12 Turkmenistan 2:1 Philippines (DRS)
16/3/12 North Korea 2:0 Palestine (DRS)


THIRD-PLACE PLAY-OFF

19/3/12 Philippines 4:3 Palestine (DRS)


FINAL

19/3/12 Turkmenistan 1:2 North Korea (DRS)

AFC CHALLENGE CUP WINNERS

2006: Tajikistan (Runners-up: Sri Lanka)
2008: India (Runners-up: Tajikistan)
2010: North Korea (Runners-up: Turkmenistan)
2012: North Korea (Runners-up: Turkmenistan)










Monday, March 12, 2012

THE SUÁREZ & EVRA AFFAIR - THE LAST WORD

Many column inches have been filled, much hot-air has been released and much bile spilled forth over the whole business concerning Liverpool's Luis Suárez and Manchester United player Patrice Evra since that incident at Old Trafford when the teams met there in a Premier League match last October. Suárez, of course, received an eight-match ban from the FA for using "racist language" against Evra when he called his French opponent a "negro."

Once, according to Suárez. At least ten times, Evra claimed in a post-match interview with Canal+. Five times, United manager Sir Alex Ferguson told match referee Andre Marriner. Seven times, said the FA when handing down the ban to the Uruguayan.

Anyway, after much hoo-hah from all concerned in the time between the incident and Suárez's day of judgement at FA HQ just before Christmas, the Liverpool player settled down and partook of his enforced rest period, augmented by a one-match ban for what the tabloids would (rather hypocritically) call "making an obscene gesture", in other words, giving the middle-finger, to Fulham fans a few weeks after the game at Old Trafford. United, not to mention a large percentage of their supporters, felt smug.

No need to go in to detail once again about all the other shenanigans that went on between mid-October and the Yuletide period; they, the report and the sentencing have already been covered in earlier entries on this blog ("Luis Suárez - Banned And Fined, But Is He Just As Much Sinned Against As Sinner?" and "'The Football Association and Luis Suárez - Reasons of the Regulatory Commission' - Discuss.", to be precise.) Suárez still maintains his innocence, Liverpool still maintain he is innocent; what is surely beyond dispute is that he should not have said what he did to Evra, not even once, and his admission that he called Evra a "negro" once and once only was basically an admission of guilt.

However, your correspondent is still of the opinion that the ban was too severe, the fine imposed by the FA (40000 Pounds Sterling) was not harsh enough, and that Suárez should perhaps have been made to undertake a FA course in British football culture. Others who are better-versed in the art of writing than I am have criticised the possibility of such a course ever coming to fruition; such a course would do no harm, though, and would prepare any and all foreign players for life in the Premier League or Football League. It may still be something for the FA to think about. After all, no club, nor a player's agent, can cater for every eventuality during a player's career.

Suárez's career has not been without controversy; he had a quick gnaw on PSV Eindhoven player Otman Bakkal's shoulder during a league game in November 2010, for which he received a seven-game ban. (There is no truth in the rumour, by the way, that Suárez has been lined up to play the role of The Count in "Sesame Street: The Movie" alongside PFA chief Gordon Taylor as the Ghost of Mr. Hooper and Manchester United assistant manager Mike Phelan as Uncle Fester - oops, sorry, wrong film..)

Before that, of course, he gained world-wide notoriety for deliberately parrying Ghanaian player Dominic Adiyiah's goalbound header on the line in the last minute of extra-time of the 2010 World Cup quarter-final between Uruguay and Ghana, at Port Elizabeth's Nelson Mandela Bay Stadium. (Ghanaian captain Asamoah Gyan ballooned the resulting penalty against the bar, which sent the ball careering over and into the black of the night sky. Uruguay went on to win in the penalty shoot-out. The ball, meanwhile, was eventually found less than 15 miles from the border with Lesotho.)

Having served his suspension, Suárez returned to action against Spurs during the 0:0 Premier League draw at Anfield on 6/2/12, and immediately earned a yellow card for hoofing Scott Parker in the stomach and much criticism to boot. For those who love statistics and criticise Suárez for diving, Gareth Bale received a yellow card for diving during the game; he became the first player in this season's Premier League campaign to have received two bookings for what is now described as "simulation."

Four days later came the much-awaited game at Old Trafford against Manchester United; it was the first time that Suárez and Evra came face-to-face since the match at Anfield in October. United manager Sir Alex Ferguson, in response to his Liverpool counterpart Kenny Dalglish's comments that it was good to have Suárez back and that he should never have been banned in the first place, ratcheted up the temperature by saying: "Well, why didn't they [Liverpool] appeal?..They have said plenty, haven't they?"

The world at large, and the media, Manchester United and Liverpool fans in particular, was watching. They were especially waiting for the pre-match handshakes, to see what would happen when Suárez and Evra came across each other. Suárez had, according to press reports, agreed to shake Evra's hand; as it turned out, he did not do so.

How? Why? According to what television pictures you look at on websites such as YouTube, Suárez ignored Evra and proceeded to United goalkeeper David De Gea. Evra then tugged on Suárez's arm, who then brushed off Evra. Suárez and a rather bemused-looking De Gea then shook hands, though Rio Ferdinand, who was next in line, pointedly refused to shake Suárez's hand in a petty gesture.

In footage taken from other angles, Evra's hand, which was positioned at an already low angle, seems to retract when Suárez approaches, forcing Suárez to go instead to De Gea. In all footage, Evra is seen, after Suárez goes past him, stepping out of the line-up, and taking up a theatrical, almost Caesar-like, pose, ("Et tu, Lúis?") sweeping his arm out in a rather grandiose manner while looking into the television camera, until Liverpool 'keeper Pepe Reina pushed him back.

Who was to blame? Many will say Suárez, others will say Evra. It matters not. If the pre-match handshakes are an integral part of the routine, they should be carried through, and they weren't on this occasion. Suárez was castigated by all and sundry for not shaking Evra's hand, but, by the same token, one can only imagine what would have been said if the players had shaken hands.

At the start of the match itself, Evra and Ferdinand went scurrying after Suárez with obvious intent to play (or draw and quarter) the man, only for Evra to bring down Ferdinand. At half-time, the Frenchman apparently attempted to confront Suárez in the players' tunnel, which resulted in a melée involving players from both teams and members of the local constabulary.

United won the game by 2 goals to 1, but not before Suárez, of all people, got his name on the scoresheet. More fun and games followed at the end of the match, when, as Suárez was walking towards the tunnel in front of the Stretford End, Evra began springing around in front of him, waving his arms in gay abandon, with all the verve of a 45-year-old sheep-farmer who had just lost his virginity and wasn't shy of letting his neighbour - and bitterest rival - know all about it. Match referee Phil Dowd was too late to stop Evra making a fool of himself, but not too late to have a word in his ear. However, he still couldn't prevent all hell breaking loose while Suárez continued walking calmly on.

Suárez was the villain of the piece as far as the media was concerned for not shaking Evra's hand; perhaps he should have made more of an attempt to do so, especially if he had agreed to do so before the match. On the other hand, Evra had not said anything about shaking Suárez's hand before the match. The Sky Sports team covering the game, Jamie Redknapp apart, reacted with indignation to what had happened, putting the blame firmly on Suárez's shoulders.

Ferguson let rip on-camera after the game, saying that Suárez was a "disgrace to Liverpool Football Club." The United manager continued his tirade thus (quote from the Sunday People): "That player [Suárez] should not be allowed to play for Liverpool again. It [Suárez and Evra not shaking hands] could have caused a riot..I would get rid of him, I really would - I was really disappointed with that guy." Fergie was much milder in his opinion of Evra, and went on to say that Evra should not have reacted at the end of the match in the manner he did (you don't say), but defended his French star by saying that his behaviour was "understandable." 

An infuriated Dalglish, meanwhile, told Sky Sports reporter Geoff Shreeves that he didn't see the non-handshake, that he "didn't know he [Suárez] refused to shake his [Evra's] hand. I'll take your word for it..That's contrary to what I was told." Dalglish also told Shreeves that he thought the reporter was being "very severe and..bang out of order to blame Luis Suárez for anything that happened.."

Suárez had agreed before the game to shake Evra's hand as part of the pre-match routine, according to Liverpool managing director Ian Ayre, but for some reason obviously did not do so. As a result, Ayre issued a statement, which contained the below quote.

"He was wrong to mislead us and wrong not to offer his hand to Patrice Evra. He has not only let himself down, but also Kenny Dalglish, his teammates and the Club. It has been made absolutely clear to Luis Suarez that his behaviour was not acceptable..Luis Suarez has now apologised for his actions which was the right thing to do. However, all of us have a duty to behave in a responsible manner and we hope that he now understands what is expected of anyone representing Liverpool Football Club."

Suárez issued a statement moments before Ayre, in which he said: "I have spoken with the manager since the game at Old Trafford and I realise I got things wrong. I've not only let him down, but also the Club and what it stands for and I'm sorry. I made a mistake and I regret what happened. I should have shaken Patrice Evra's hand before the game and I want to apologise for my actions. I would like to put this whole issue behind me and concentrate on playing football." The Uruguayan also wrote on Twitter that he was sad because Liverpool had lost and was "disappointed because everything is not as it seems."

All very cryptic, but perhaps he was, in fact, correct in saying so. There was also speculation that Suárez refused to shake Evra's hand as he believed he was innocent of all charges. Perhaps the Liverpool player was referring to Evra's behaviour in what turned out to be a not-very-fair-play handshake (and also that Evra might have declined to shake his hand). 

Dalglish also apologised for his outburst to Shreeves, and, issued his own statement, saying: "When I went on TV after yesterday's game I hadn't seen what had happened, but I did not conduct myself in a way befitting of a Liverpool manager during that interview and I'd like to apologise for that."

Even Liverpool's sponsors, Standard Chartered bank, were also reported to have been less than happy with Suárez's behaviour, and representatives of the bank allegedly had what was described as "a very robust conversation" with Liverpool officials the day after the game at Old Trafford. One might say that a bank - any bank - criticising what might be termed as the "unethical" behaviour of a particular individual would be a gross example of extreme irony. (The whole Suárez and Evra saga is riddled with extreme irony..)

Ferguson, meanwhile, did not utter so much as a peep regarding his own tirade, but his club later put out the following statement: "Manchester United thanks Liverpool for the apologies issued following Saturday's game. Everyone at Old Trafford wants to move on from this. The history of our two great clubs is one of success and rivalry unparalleled in British football. That should be the focus in the future of all those who love the clubs."

Suárez would have like to have been able to put everything behind him, but Sun columnist Steven Howard wasn't going to let it lie just yet, referring to Suárez as a "dodgy piece of work who can't be trusted" and a "sociopath." This is a bit rich, coming from a man writing for a "newspaper" which is under the ownership of News International, a newspaper which blatantly lied about the behaviour of Liverpool supporters in the immediate aftermath of what was to become known as the Hillsborough Disaster, which happened in 1989, and which is famous for, among other things, being anti-Irish and having a distaste for people of colour, not to mention a publication which displays rather anti-homophobic at times.

The paper's editor at the time of the Hillsborough Disaster, Kelvin MacKenzie, in a blatant attempt to recover decimated sales of said publication on Merseyside, belatedly apologised in 2004 to relatives of those who died in the tragedy for what had been written about the deceased..and then, two years later, reportedly retracted the apology after saying he had been "forced" to issue it.

The Sun, on 26/2/12, carried the following headline: "Luis Suárez's granny reveals she used to call him 'Mí Negrito'" with a sub-headline, an alleged quote from Suárez's grandmother, Lila Piriz - "It's my fault he said what he did" - underneath. Well, as one might imagine, the article goes on to describe the lives, houses and neighbourhoods of those he left behind in great detail..but there was no sign of Sra. Piriz admitting culpability for her grandson's actions, only an affirmation that she used to call Liverpool's number 7 "Mí negrito."

Last weeken, an article appeared in the Sunday edition of the same newspaper in which a judge criticised the actions of Suárez after a man hailing from Greater Manchester ended up in court, charged with assaulting his partner. The man, Graham Trelfa, who was sitting watching the preamble to the Manchester United : Liverpool match at home with his girlfriend, apparently flung a remote-control at her (hitting her in the eye) and threw her to the floor after the Uruguayan did not shake Evra's hand.

The judge, Jonathan Taaffe, in passing a community service order sentence on Trelfa, called the assailant "a bully", and went on to describe Suárez as "petulant" and like a spoilt child." The article went on: "He [the judge] added: "The actions of a so-called role model can affect the behaviour of many." The same could be said of the media, could it not? In the light of the accused already having been found guilty of, and cautioned for, a similar offence back in 2008 (there was no mention in the article as to which Liverpool player was responsible), Judge Taaffe's comments should only be regarded as utterly laughable and not befitting of a man in his position.

Alan Shearer was critical of Suárez on the BBC's football highlights programme Match of the Day last weekend, alleging that he dived to earn a penalty against Arsenal, when he was actually clearly fouled; yes, he was clipped and went to ground, but although I'm no slouch myself - if only at the dinner-table, mind - I'm a lot slower than Suárez and I still end up doing somersaults when I nudge the edge of the sofa. Shearer is a fine one to talk about diving.

Yes, Suárez deliberately handled the ball on the line against Ghana; don't forget, though, that he (justifiably) earned a red card for his misdemeanour, which put him out of the 2010 World Cup semi-final. Anyone who has condemned Suárez for doing what he did and says that they would not do the same in such an important match is guilty of self-delusion, and those who, for want of a better phrase, keep harping on about it are flogging a dead horse and need to stop moralising. The "Suárez + handball against Ghana = cheat" argument is all a bit hackneyed and sooo 2010, you know.

If it had been Germany, for example, instead of Ghana, would the moral indignation of the media-led masses have been so strong? If Gyan had scored the penalty and the Black Stars had won, the Suárez handball would have been all but forgotten about. Show me a footballer who wouldn't do the same thing as Lúis Suárez did against Ghana and I'll buy you a drink, maybe two.

The Sun, then, and other sections of the media, not to mention bloggers and others who respond to what the media says and does, have vilified Suárez to an unacceptable degree. Yes, to repeat the point, Lúis Suárez should have not said what he said to Evra, and a ban was in order. Yes, he should have shaken Evra's hand, but the fact that it didn't happen appears as though that might not have been solely down to him, if one can use television pictures when forming an opinion.

Back to Evra. The Frenchman has escaped the wrath of the media, but is hardly blameless in all of this, even though he has kept quiet through all of what has happened since October, at the behest of his manager. If Suárez deliberately ignored Evra during the pre-match handshakes, then Evra had the right to feel aggrieved; again, the Uruguayan later apologised for not shaking Evra's hand.

On the other hand, if, as it appeared from certain angles during the television coverage of the game's preamble, Evra deliberately kept his hand down to provoke some sort of response from Suárez and then decided to indulge in some theatrics, he only succeeded in making himself look small. His and Ferdinand's attempt to possibly inflict bodily harm on his opponent less than a minute into the game fortunately backfired.

As mentioned already, Ferguson described Evra's behaviour at the end of the game as ünderstandable." Really, Sir Alex? Is a deliberate attempt to provoke a fellow professional justified? Never mind Dalglish's perhaps ill-considered statement to the media in the tunnel or Suárez being provocative - he is certainly a controversial character, and Liverpool surely knew what they were getting when they signed him - Evra's behaviour could have caused a riot after the game. 

Although the FA have seemingly turned a blind eye to Evra's conduct, and Ferguson's extremely unprofessional outburst after the game, both men have ended up coming out of the whole mess with precious little dignity intact. Evra, at the very least, deserved to have been carded for ungentlemanly conduct. Both gentlemen could, and maybe should, have been facing an FA charge of bringing the game into disrepute, not to mention incitement.

Suárez not only apologised for what he had said to Evra back in October (he made a statement in which he said that the word "negro" - or "negrito" - was acceptable in Uruguay, and, yes, he did add an apology to those who may have been offended by what he said to Evra), but also apologised for not shaking Evra's hand before the game. Neither Evra nor Ferguson have apologised for their actions before, during and/or after the game. What Judge Jonathan Taaffe said about Luis Suárez could be applied to both United men: "The actions of a so-called role model can affect the behaviour of many."

Both players have moved on, and hopefully the rest of the football world will do likewise. Although Liverpool have had a stop-start season, Suárez has been a thorn in the collective sides of many defences, and won his first winners' medal with the Reds when they defeated Cardiff City on penalties recently, more than doing his bit with a lively display, hitting the post (Martin Skrtel scored from the rebound). Whether he will still be in English football come next season will still be open to debate; he will be missed, not least by the media, so in that sense, they are cutting their own throats with their attitude, which often borders on xenophobic hate, towards the Uruguayan. He is a colourful, often controversial character, as is Wayne Rooney, for example, but, then, Suárez is Uruguayan and Rooney is English.

At the end of the day, to repeat what was said at the very beginning of this article, a lot of things have been said in the printed, televisual and not-so-social media about the whole affair, a lot of which, posted by anonymous posters (and mostly, but not all, from supporters of both clubs), has been of an extremely derogatory, not to mention racist, repugnant and also homophobic, nature towards both players, and all of which is utterly reprehensible and cowardly. (Many of the comments posted were potentially breaking the law as a result of their content.) 

Many people will disagree with what I have written in this article, and they are entitled to do so, but it is meant as fair comment and has tried to be objective. It's high time that everybody - both players, both clubs, both sets of supporters and the media - gathered up their coats and moved on. It's only football, after all. In the overall picture, when people are dying because of war and famine, whether or not two players shake hands is a bit of an irrelevance..even if whey should have done, regardless of who was to blame for this not happening. It perhaps says little of us all that we have been all so focused on this side of the Suárez-Evra saga in the midst of infinitely more important things.




Wednesday, February 29, 2012

THE CHIPOLOPOLO DO JUSTICE TO THE LOST GENERATION - PART 2

So, it was off to Libreville, capital of Gabon, for the Chipolopolo, and also for Côte d'Ivoire, who had defeated Mali 1:0 in the other semi-final courtesy of a goal just before half-time from Gervinho, who had picked the ball up in his own half and ran unopposed into the Malian box before sidefooting the ball past the 'keeper. Didier Drogba and Yaya Touré both saw efforts rebounding off the woodwork, which would surely have put the game beyond a dogged Mali side had they gone in.

Upon arriving in Libreville on the Friday before the final, the entire Zambian team, plus staff, officials and manager Hervé Renard, travelled to the beach where many of the bodies of their predecessors were washed up 19 years earlier following the air-crash, to lay wreaths and pray at the scene.

For Les Éléphants, meanwhile, there was also added motivation to bring the Africa Cup of Nations trophy back to the Ivorian capital, Abidjan. The country was still mentally spilt after the conflict which ravaged the country after seriously flawed elections at the end of 2010, which only ended in April 2011 with the incumbent president Laurent Gbagbo, who had refused to give up power, being arrested and opposition candidate Alassane Ouattara being sworn into office. Over a thousand people are estimated to have been killed during the conflict; Gbagbo is currently awaiting trial for human rights abuses at the International Court of Human Rights in The Hague.

Both teams expressed their respect for each other before the final, one which was eagerly awaited by many. Côte d'Ivoire, with their conservative style of play, were strong favourites to win the Africa Cup of Nations for only the second time in the country's history; the team's only triumph in the competition came in 1992, when they beat Ghana 11:10 on penalties after a scoreless 120 minutes in the Senegalese capital, Dakar. Ghana were fancying their chances of getting their name on the trophy for the fifth time, and for the first time since 1982, but, of course, Zambia had already put paid to that ambition.

Ghana didn't even finish third this time round; Mali defeated them by 2 goals to nil in the third-place play-off thanks to a brace from Cheick Diabaté, one in each half. It was revenge for Ghana's victory over Les Aigles in the group stages, and a deserved victory for the Malians to boot. It could have been by a bigger margin, but Sulley Muntari's goal was chalked off for offside. Black Stars defender Isaac Vorsah was sent off just after the hour mark for a second bookable offence, but the whole Ghanaian team seemed very out of sorts and their minds seemed to be already in the departure lounge at Malabo airport. The third place was Mali's best result in the Africa Cup of Nations since a 3:2 defeat to Congo (then known as Congo-Brazzaville) in the final of the Cameroonian-hosted 1972 edition of the tournament.

That was then; the final this time round took place at Libreville's Stade d'Angondjé, and there was scarce an empty seat in the house. The Ivorian support was evident in the stands, as it was all the way through the tournament, while several hundred Chipolopolo supporters had made their way to Gabon to join the few dozen already there, and had done so on chartered aircraft at a price of some $US2050 a pop (flight and match-ticket included, of course). The locals had thrown their weight behind the underdogs, which didn't go un-noticed given the fraught relationship between the Gabonaise and Zambian governments since the air-crash in 1993. Football was once again showing itself to be a great healer.

Amid all the poignancy of the Zambians intent on bringing honour to their predecessors, and that of the Ivorians looking to bring a little happiness to a country still recovering from years of conflict, one would almost think that it was easy to overlook the fact that there was a football match to be played.

It was not a final which saw an immense number of chances, but the first one came in the second minute when Zambia's Nathan Sinkala, free in the penalty-area after a well-worked corner which saw Kalaba stroke the ball to captain Christopher Katongo, who then passed to Sinkala, saw his low drive well saved by Boubacar Barry in the Ivorian goal.

A few minutes later, Joseph Musonda was injured while making a challenge, seemingly hurting his ankle, and, despite gamely battling on, the defender was in some distress, giving Hervé Renard no option but to substitute him in the 12th minute. It was a pity for Musonda, who had been having a good tournament but, after being sportingly consoled by Didier Drogba, left the field in tears to a standing ovation.

Emmanuel Mayuka headed over a chip from Chisamba Lungu a couple of minutes later as Zambia dominated early proceedings, with a couple of Drogba free-kicks, one of which was comfortably dealt with by Kennedy Mweene in the Zambian goal, all that Les Éléphants had to muster in the first 20 minutes, but the Zambian defence were on panic stations a few minutes later following an Ivorian corner, but the ball was eventually cleared to safety. A warning for the Chipolopolo, and there was another one on the half-hour, when, after a lightning-fast move from the Ivorians, Yaya Touré flashed his shot inches wide of the post.

Nathan Sinkala had a chance to put Zambia ahead from a Kalaba corner but, standing alone in a space as big as a car-park, he seemed to lose his composure, slipped and fell over, swiping not at the ball but at thin air. A lucky escape for the Ivorian defence, who, in stark contrast to their defensive form throughout the tournament, in which they were yet to concede a goal, were occasionally looking shaky and, at times, gifting their opponents too much free space in their own penalty-area.

Sinkala was not the only one feeling the heat; Hervé Renard, his manager, who, in the latter stages of the semi-final win against Ghana, looked as though he was suffering from a mixture of an apoplectic fit and an audition for the Woodentops, was just as animated in this game, stalking the touchline, standing beside the dug-out, and then whacking Davies Nkausu for good measure, telling him to concentrate as the defender was preparing to take a throw-in directly in front of the technical area.

A scoreless first-half, then, and the second half saw Didier Drogba take centre-stage, starting with his receiving treatment for a blow to the back of the head suffered in a clash with Nyambe Mulenga. Drogba was starting to irritate with his mixture of diving and appealing, but this time, he looked pretty dazed. He was back creating havoc in the Zambia box within minutes, missing a half-chance with Stoppila Sunzu in attendance, and heading way over the bar from a Salomon Kalou free-kick, one of the few contributions of note from Kalou, who had been having a rather subdued game, to put it mildly; he would be substituted minutes later.

A game-changing moment arrived in the 69th minute, when Gervinho picked up the ball and hustled his way into the penalty-area, and was nudged in the back by Chansa just as Mulenga was closing in; it looked like one of those "we've seen them waved away" challenges, but not this time. The referee, who was having an immaculate game, got the decision right when he pointed to the spot.

Mulenga was booked, and Didier Drogba stepped up to take the kick, facing Mweene, who had saved Asamoah Gyan's penalty for Ghana early on in the semi-final, and was intent in putting Drogba off by continually talking to him. The man in yellow did his homework; Drogba's attempt wouldn't have looked out of place on any given Aussie Rules oval - it was long, high and wide. Mweene raced out of his area towards Drogba as the Ivorian was standing looking down at the penalty-spot, and prowled round him, waving his hand in front of his face. Drogba could only smile, ruefully, probably reflecting on the fact that history was repeating itself. He had missed a penalty in the 2006 shoot-out defeat to hosts Egypt, and that after missing a sitter with just a few minutes to go in the regulation 90.

There weren't too many more chances after that in normal time, though Max Gradel - Kalou's replacement - could have won it for Les Éléphants late on with an attempt at goal which was just off-target, while a bad bounce and a good, timely interception by Kolo Touré robbed Emanuel Mayuka of potentially swinging the game in favour of Zambia just before full-time.

Extra-time, then, and the two Katongos - Felix, who had come on for Mulenga, and Christopher - combined early on in the first-half for the latter to prod the ball towards Barry's goal, but the Ghanaian 'keeper nudged the ball with his studs, clipping the ball on to the post and away for a corner. Apart from Drogba falling all over the place, Gervinho looking dangerous at times, some good passing movement and one or two more Aussie Rules-style efforts from both teams, plus a couple of last-ditch interventions from Sunzu, there wasn't a whole lot to get worked up about as both teams seemed to be accepting that penalty-kicks would be the only manner in which this game was going to be settled.

No goals in the 120 minutes thus far, and despite there being a lack of shots on target, both teams had played their part in what was, for all that, an engrossing final, and the intent to attack was there, especially from the Chipolopolo. One could have expected more from Côte d'Ivoire, however, not just during the final but during the tournament as well; François Zahoui's team seemed to be too conservative at times. Too late to worry about that now, though; penalties loomed.

In what would become a memorable scene, the Zambian substitutes were singing on the touchline, much more tunefully than Les Éléphants when they were getting stuck into their national anthem before kick-off. Now, Zahoui looked concerned, Renard relaxed, yet determined, in one of his three lucky white shirts.

Cheik Tioté went first for Côte d'Ivoire, dismissed Mweene's attempts to put him off, and scored. Boubacar Barry took his time carefully placing his towel directly behind him, but his attempt at gamesmanship didn't work either. Christopher Katongo levelled things up anyway, rounding off an excellent contribution from the man who led Zambia by example from the first minute of the tournament. (Question: Katongo stuttered slightly during the run-up. Should the penalty have been re-taken?) Successful attempts from Wilfried Bony and Emmanuel Mayuka (the only player in the Zambian squad currently playing in European top-flight football and who is currently a star-turn at Young Boys Berne) left the score at 2:2.

Kennedy Mweene then became Zambia's hero, saving Souleman Bamba's penalty. Hero status lasted just a few seconds, however, as the match-officials spotted Mweene yards off the goal-line before the kick was taken. Bamba executed the re-take with relish. Isaac Chansa put Zambia on level terms. Max Gradel then slotted home the Ivorians' fourth penalty - each penalty (apart from that which had to be retaken) saw Mweene dive the wrong way - before Felix Katongo made it all square.

Didier Drogba was next up, and he atoned somewhat for his miss from the spot during normal time, driving his attempt home. Mweene, who regularly takes penalties for his South African club Free State Stars (he has scored six goals during his career), took his turn and sent Barry the wrong way.

Ten penalties taken, ten scored; Siaka Tiene made it 6:5 for the men in orange, before Nathan Sinkala levelled matters once again. Konan Ya and Chisamba Lungu brought the score up to 7-apiece in what was proving to be an exemplary penalty shoot-out.

Kolo Touré was not having the best of nights, and his evening was to get a whole lot worse as Mweene easily palmed away his effort, going down to his left. Kalaba stepped up to take his place in African football history..but the Zambia man, who had impressed immensely, blotted his copy-book somewhat by hoofing his spot-kick well over the goal. No matter, his team-mates on the touchline were still singing their hearts out.

Gervinho, for your correspondent's money one of the Ivorians' best players during the tournament because of his desire to get forward not to mention some fine play in and around the midfield area, was next up, but he didn't seem to want to be bothered taking part in the shoot-out (having had a heated discussion with Zahoui before it commenced) and his penalty, er, reflected that, missing the target by the rhetorical country mile.

So, it was up to Stoppila Sunzu to succeed where Kalaba failed and deliver the Africa Cup of Nations for Zambia, and he did so in some style, sending Barry the wrong way whilst hammering the ball into the roof of the net. The African Cup of Nations was heading to Lusaka. An historic moment for Sunzu, an historic moment for Zambian football and a poignant moment for Kalusha Bwalya and the families of the Chipolopolo killed in the 1993 air-crash a few miles from the Stade d'Angondjé. The ghosts of 1993 had, for Zambian football at the very least, if not for the families of those who perished, finally been exorcised.

One of the most evocative images (to use a hackneyed old phrase) of the final and its aftermath was Hervé Renard carrying the injured Musonda half the length of the pitch to join in the celebrations in front of the travelling Zambian support with his team-mates, at which point Renard scarpered the scene and headed back over to behind the dug-out to have a chat with a clearly delighted and emotional Bwalya, who was also mobbed by the boys in green and black.

The result was also a vindication of the FAZ's decision to re-appoint Renard; it also signalled Renard's transformation from zero (as far as a large percentage of Chipolopolo fans were concerned) to hero. The Afreeknews.com website ran this headline the day after the final: "Hervé Renard, Black Magic From the Blonde Sourcerer." The French ex-binman/cleaner has since been given a new contract, conjured up by the FAZ, which will run until August 2014, and, yes, the Zambian government will pick up the bill.

For Renard's opposite number, François Zahoui, the future is less certain, if rumours are to be believed, though as recently as last Friday, at a press-conference in the Ivorian capital, Abidjan, at which the president of the Fédération Ivorienne du Football (FIF) Sidy Diallo, was present, he stated that he was still the man in command and was looking forward to the forthcoming friendly against Guinea this coming Wednesday, a match which, according to a report carried in Goal.com, would "reconcile my team with the general public after the mishap of February 12 in Libreville." Surely a contract extension is in order for the man many Ivorians call "The Statue;" to finish second in a continental competition is no disgrace, after all, and would hardly be a good reason to sack a manager who, let's face it, delivered.

What price Zambia being named Team of The Year and Renard collecting the Manager of the Year at the 2012 FIFA awards? One man who has already reaped the fruits of the good form of the Zambian team is captain Christopher Katongo. Before the semi-final against Ghana, Katongo, who, in addition to playing professionally in China, is also still attached to the Zambian armed forces, was promoted to Warrant Officer, Class One, by the Zambian president, Michael Sata, "with immediate effect for displaying exemplary leadership and skill in the team."

Warrant Officer, Class One, is the highest rank in the Zambian Army for non-commissioned officers; Katongo previously held the Class Two rank and before that was a Corporal. Not only that, but he will now be the "face of Pepsi" in Zambia after signing a one-year contract with the multi-national soft-drinks company last weekend. The Zambian government has given each team-member a US$59000 bonus for winning the Africa Cup of Nations.

The celebrations in Zambia were long and loud, and started almost as soon as Sunzu dispatched his spot-kick.
Lusaka came to a virtual standstill, while locals in Livingstone were celebrating alongside a large number of Zimbabweans who had crossed the border in the afternoon to lend their support. Sadly, at least two people died and some thirty-five were injured during the celebrations, which went on all night and lasted until well into the following evening, by which time the Chipolopolo had arrived back in Zambia and had attended an open-air ceremony at Lusaka Showgrounds.

All's well that ends well, but that was then, and the Zambian team must now focus on the future. The 2013 Africa Cup of Nations has already begun (more on that shortly), and the 14 winners of the first-round ties will go into the hat for the second round along with the 16 teams competing in this year's finals. Zambia are now the team to beat, and who would have bet on that before the tournament started? This could be the springboard to something good; the second round of CAF qualifiers for the 2014 World Cup begin later this year, and a berth in the finals in Brazil would certainly be something to aim for.

The Chipolopolo, version 2012, are a unified, indomitable, skilful bunch with a team-ethic the envy of most squads, but they will have to be on their guard. Drawn in Group D, they will have to face Lesotho (already eliminated from the 2013 Africa Cup of Nations qualifiers), Sudan and..Ghana. The Black Stars (not to mention the Sudanese) will be out for revenge, and they will get an early chance to exact it; their second game in the group is scheduled to take place, away to Zambia, on 8/6/12. Zambia, meanwhile, will kick off on 1/6/12 away to Sudan, and their last game will be at home, against Sudan, on 14/6/13.

The third and final round, which is planned for October and November next year, will consist of home and away ties between the winners of the ten group winners from the second round. Will Zambia be in the mix come late 2013? They've got to get out of a rather tricky group first, but they've already shown what they are capable of by winning the 2012 Africa Cup of Nations, and in doing so, paid due honour to their fallen predecessors from 1993. They would have surely been proud of the achievement of the current batch. Who knows, the current team's story may yet run and run..

ZAMBIA SQUAD (2012 AFRICA CUP OF NATIONS)

GOALKEEPERS: 1 Kalililo KAKONJE (TP Mazembe, DRC), 16 Kennedy MWEENE (Free State Stars, RSA), 22 Joshua TITIMA (Power Dynamos)

DEFENDERS: 2 Francis KASONDE (TP Mazembe, DRC), 4 Joseph MUSONDA (Golden Arrows, SAF), 5 Hijani HIMOONDE (TP Mazembe, DRC), Davies NKAUSU (Supersport United, SAF), 13 Stoppila SUNZU (TP Mazembe, DRC), 15 Chintu KAMPAMBA (Wits University/Bidvest Wits, RSA), 23 Nyambe MULENGA (Zesco United)

MIDFIELDERS: 3 Chisamba LUNGU (Ural Yekaterinburg, RUS), 7 Clifford MULENGA (Bloemfontein Celtic, RSA), 8 Isaac CHANSA (Orlando Pirates, RSA), 10 Felix KATONGO (Green Buffaloes), 14 Noah CHIVUTA (Free State Stars, RSA), 17 Rainford KALABA (TP Mazembe, DRC), 19 Nathan SINKALA (Green Buffaloes), 21 Jonas SAKUWAHA (Al-Merreikh, SUD)

FORWARDS: 9 Collins MBESUMA (Golden Arrows, RSA), 11 Christopher KATONGO (Henan Construction, PRC), 12 James CHAMANGA (Dalian Shide, PRC), 18 Evans KANGWA (Nkana Red Devils), 20 Emmanuel MAYUKA (Young Boys Berne, CH)


MANAGER: Hervé RENARD (FRA)

ASSISTANT MANAGER: Patrice BEAUMELLE (FRA)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AUTHOR'S NOTE: Please find below links from some of the media mentioned in the above article, starting with the link to Afreeknews.com article on Hervé Renard:
http://www.afreeknews.com/article.php?item_id=1409

"My old man's a dustman.." Link on Rfi.fr article concerning Renard on life with the bins:
http://www.english.rfi.fr/africa/20120211-herve-renard-coach-zambia-team

Link to Goal.com article on the future of François Zahoui:
http://www.goal.com/en/news/89/africa/2012/02/24/2926925/cote-divoire-coach-francois-zahoui-i-am-still-in-command

Link to Tumfweko.com article on Hervé Renard's contract extension:
http://tumfweko.com/2012/02/17/renard-gets-3-year-contract/

Link to ZambianWatchdog.com's article on the Chipolopolo's Tanzanian benefactor:
http://www.zambianwatchdog.com/index.php/brreaking-news/impressed-tanzanian-gives-zambia-national-soccer-team-cash/

Link to MTNFootball.com's bust-up between Renard and Clifford Mulenga, which led to Mulenga's expulsion from the team:
http://www.mtnfootball.com/africa/african-tournaments/african-cup-of-nations/news/2012/february/01-mulenga-i-want-asked-to-apologise.html

CAFOnline, Wikipedia and other named media organisations were also used as sources of reference. Thank goodness for Eurosport as well!